Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6132 14
Original file (NR6132 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
Ka. 5

te

   

Bh \U/25NB Der PIN DAMEeT eer ee ees

BaF iebtiltn: S, ACOA DTAACAKIT MO THE RALY

 

ONRDm FO COPRPECTION OF NAMA Per

701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

BAN
Docket No.NR06132-14
10 October 2014

 

This igs in reference to your application for correction to your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section
1652.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October
2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

 

ablish the existence of probable material error 7
In making this determination the Board concurred with the comments

(NPC) memo 1812 PERS-00/084 of
it a copy which was provided to you at your address of
record. Furthermore, the Board noted that you did not provide any
additional documentation that would change the outcome of NPC's
original determination. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

HOW

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No.NRO6132-14

ction of an official naval
to demonstrate the existence of

plying E6r a Serre
record, the burden is on the applicant

Consequently, when ap

probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
ott eo ME
Me IAF) A PIF

oO
GUIEN (pS
ROBERT J. ONEILL
Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4855 14

    Original file (NR4855 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its cecision in this case. NR4855-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14

    Original file (NR5107 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2696 14

    Original file (NR2696 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 31 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3872 14

    Original file (NR3872 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3608 14

    Original file (NR3608 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NR3608-14 9 Oct 14 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552), A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2156 14

    Original file (NR2156 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. 4 However after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4400 14

    Original file (NR4400 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket MNo.NkKO44U0-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofiiciai naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR777 14

    Original file (NR777 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5773 14

    Original file (NR5773 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5641 13

    Original file (NR5641 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application on 94 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 5420 PERS -836 dated a. a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.